Satan The Dragon Tiamat Theistic Satanism

 Satan The Dragon Tiamat Theistic Satanism

4932cc4d-f963-43e0-b83e-3026e022ad6a-2_1024x1024

Tiamat (goddess)

Tiamat is a personification of the primordial sea from which the gods were first created. She is also the main adversary of Marduk in the Enūma Eliš TT .

Functions

Tiamat’s exact functions as a goddess are difficult to establish. As her name indicates (see below), she was a deification of the primordial sea. Our best source of information for Tiamat is the myth Enūma Eliš TT , and in fact, there are only a handful of references to her outside of it. Enūma Eliš TT  begins with a description of the two primeval seas, the salt sea Tiamat and the sweet sea Abzu TT , mingling their waters together to create the gods (for recent translations of the story see Foster 2005: 436-486 and Lambert 2013). In the following battle between Abzu TT  and Ea, Tiamat attempts to appease Abzu TT  and stop the conflict. But when she is later pressured by the lower gods to revenge him, she herself becomes the main antagonist of the story, creating an army of monsters led by her new consort, Qingu. She is ultimately defeated by Marduk, who incapacitates her with his “Evil Wind” and then kills her with an arrow. Marduk splits her in two, creating heaven and earth from her body, the Tigris and Euphrates from her eyes, mist from her spittle, mountains from her breasts and so on. Throughout the epic, there are differing descriptions of Tiamat: she appears both as a body of water, as a human figure, and as having a tail (Tablet V, line 59). These varying descriptions are ultimately reconciled as Marduk turns her limbs into geographical features.

Divine Genealogy and Syncretisms

In Enūma Eliš TT , Tiamat is the mother of all the gods (Tablet I, line 4). Together with Abzu TT  she creates Lahmu and Lahamu, who in turn beget Anšar and Kišar.

Though one cannot point to a syncretism as such, there are several models for Tiamat in the earlier mythology. Katz (2011: 18f) argues that the figure of Tiamat unites two strands of tradition attached to the sea. The first is the motherly figure of Namma, who is also referred to as a primeval ocean from which the gods were created. The other is the figure of the sea as a monstrous adversary, like the Levantine god Yamm (see also Jacobsen 1968: 107). Another important influence for the figure of Tiamat is Anzu, a mythical bird defeated by Ninurta, indeed the battle between Marduk and Tiamat has a number of parallels to the battle between Ninurta and Anzu (Lambert 1986).

Cult Place(s)

There was no cult dedicated directly to Tiamat, but the battle between Tiamat and Marduk played an important role in the New Year’s festival TT  in Babylon. The Enūma Eliš TT  was recited on its fourth day, and some argue that the festival included a symbolic reenactment of the mythological battle (see the discussion in Lambert 2013: 461f).

Time Periods Attested

The oldest attestation of Tiamat is an Old Akkadian incantation (Westenholz 1974: 102), though there are few other references to her until the first millenium BCE (see Lambert 2013: 237). After the composition of the Enūma Eliš TT , Tiamat is found in a number of theological commentary works, but most of these seem to rely on the epic (e.g. SAA 3.39, r. 1-3). Tiamat is also mentioned by Berossus, writing in the 3rd century BCE (Breucker 2011: 648f).

Iconography

A relief from the temple of Bêl in Palmyra depicts Nabu and Marduk slaying Tiamat, who is shown with a woman’s body and legs made of snakes (Dirven 1997). However, this scene is a late Hellenistic adoption of the Babylonian motif, and no Mesopotamian image has been positively identified as a representation of Tiamat. A string of identifications (Yadin 1971Grafman 1972Kaplan_1976) have recently been rejected (George_2012), and until new evidence surfaces they remain dubious.

Name and Spellings

The name Tiamat is uncontracted form of the word tâmtu, meaning “sea”. The long vowel â is contracted from the short vowels i and a. The word is in the “absolute state,” a noun form that is equivalent to the vocative (a grammatical case which directly invokes or addresses a person or deity; literally the name means “O, sea!”).

Written forms: dti-amat, ti-amat, dtam-tum, ti-àm-tim, ta-à-wa-ti

Normalised forms: Tiamat, Tiāmat, Tiʼamat, Thalatta (Greek).

Tiamat in Online Corpora

Further Reading

Sophus Helle

Sophus Helle, ‘Tiamat (goddess)’, Ancient Mesopotamian Gods and Goddesses, Oracc and the UK Higher Education Academy, 2016 [http://oracc.iaas.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/tiamat/]

According to Academic scholars Tiamat was the first representation of a Dragon creator and the adversary of the solar deity Marduk making her the first Adversarial Deity.
In ancient times people did not Worship our Mother because they had became corrupted by Marduk and his cult followers into believing she was evil.
But we must not forget it was Marduk not Tiamat who created humans to become the slaves of the god’s
In the Days leading to the great war between the dragon and the solar deity Humans did not exist our lives at no time where ever in danger by the creator.
The Traditional Church of Satan recognizes Tiamat as Satan but recognizes the individuals rights to choose which ever adversarial deity that they chose to recognize or not recognize. Our church believes in the importance of developing your own relationship with the deity that comes to you during meditation.

For more information visit out website
Traditional church of Satan 

Father Satan?

Father Satan?
From the desk  of
Reverend.dr.Robert Fraize

marduk

Over the years Theistic Satanists have often refered to Satan as father but why?
I would think that a theistic SATANIST would not blindly follow the ideology of  so called priests.
Sadly like all other spiritual paths Theistic Satanism has its leaches.
These leeches the  so called ministers do not wish to teach you the truth they just want to spew some old rhetorical nonsense and take your money.

The Idea of Satan being “father” comes from the christian bible in the image of  Lucifer.
but this is not even accurate as Lucifer is not a creator deity.
He did not create anything according to the bible he led an army into “hell” and was defeated.

And although I do not believe in the christianized image of Lucifer I do acknowledge his pagan roots not as The adversary of god.
Lucifer is not a christian construct  it is just the idea of Lucifer being satan that has became a christian construct and those who follow that ideology are reverse christians not that there’s anything wrong with that either.

I have seen other cults say that the Babylonian solar deity Marduk who later becomes the christian god is Father Satan.
this idea comes from the fact that Marduk created human beings to be  the slaves of the gods.
These cults also call Him a dragon when Marduk never was refereed to as a dragon in ancient Scripture yet these false preachers  spew these lies.

Marduk was not the creator of all things.
It was TiAMAT the dragon of the primordial abyss that created all things through chaos and using dark matter which is it self the abyss.
We know that the bible is just a remake a re write of older stories and Tiamat is mentioned as the dragon of old the ancient dragon or serpent in the stories.
Marduk did not protect us from the creator we did not even exist when they battled. people who claim that Marduk fought for our freedom are lying according to their own scripture the enuma elish.

Many Traditional  Theistic Satanists recognize Tiamat as The first incarnation of Satan as a deity thus recognize Satan as Female.
It was not until the religions of Abraham that Satan became a “male” figure
I challenge anyone to show me a religion pre abraham that recognizes a male adversarial creator deity.
With that Said you are free to develop your own relationship with whichever adversarial deity you choose.