Theistic Satanism is a stand alone religion.

Theistic Satanism is a stand alone religion
By
Reverend Robert Fraize.
(The leader of theistic Satanism)

I have had enough sitting back and watching people in the “satanic community” Mixing what I call bullshit into the religion of Theistic Satanism.
People will argue that Theistic Satanism is not a religion but rather a philosophy or spiritual practice. and while philosophy and individual spiritual practices are apart of Theistic Satanism that does not make it so.

Theistic Satanism is a traditional religion dating back to the days that predate the religions of abraham the Kabbalah the goetia and Ahriman.
and was established around the year 1500 BCE when the Sacred tablets the Enuma elish were written.

It is these tablets that set the foundation of the religion of Theistic Satanism the great cosmic battle between the creator Dragon Tiamat vs the solar deity Marduk.
Theistic Satanism has no historical roots with the corrupted religions that came afterwards and only Idiots and ignorant worms would believe any different.

You have people claiming to be apart of “Theistic Satanism” making all sorts of uneducated and childish claims that Theistic Satanism is whatever you want it to be.
Those of us who have studied and practiced the religion for decades know that this is not true. Call it dogmatic if you wish BUT the fact is Theistic Satanism has a set system and beliefs separate from other religions which makes it a (STAND ALONE RELIGION) .
As a Reverend of the religion Theistic Satanism it is my Job to educate people with the truth of the religion and not to keep silent on such issues.
No matter how unpopular the truth is or how many people disagree or hate me for it does not matter.

If you are a Theistic Satanists and wish to study and even practice other “religions”
that is your own personal choice.
Your personal choice does not reflect onto the religion (theistic satanism) and should never be taught as a part of the religion (theistic satanism).

The problem is that while it is important to study everything it is not logical to mix and match them because the end result is the equivalent to a bad chemical combination that leads to an explosion in the practitioners face.

I would not be much of a reverend if i was not looking out for people of the religion of which I represent would I.
so I leave you with this.

If you wish to be a Theistic Satanist be a Theistic Satanist study the religion and practice it. beware of people who are mixing various bullshit in order to sell you some products along with a pretty face.
They may get facebook and video likes but Theistic Satanism is not about popularity nor is it about the approval of others.

The goal of a Theistic Satanist is to gain the true power of the universe through a relationship with the Ancient dragon and anyone who says differently obviously has not studied very long or has read the disinformation work of e.a Koetting ford AND OTHERS .

Rev Fraize
Traditional church of Satan

Satan The Dragon Tiamat Theistic Satanism

Tiamat (goddess)

Tiamat is a personification of the primordial sea from which the gods were first created. She is also the main adversary of Marduk in the Enūma Eliš TT .

Functions

Tiamat’s exact functions as a goddess are difficult to establish. As her name indicates (see below), she was a deification of the primordial sea. Our best source of information for Tiamat is the myth Enūma Eliš TT , and in fact, there are only a handful of references to her outside of it. Enūma Eliš TT begins with a description of the two primeval seas, the salt sea Tiamat and the sweet sea Abzu TT , mingling their waters together to create the gods (for recent translations of the story see Foster 2005: 436-486 and Lambert 2013). In the following battle between Abzu TT and Ea, Tiamat attempts to appease Abzu TT and stop the conflict. But when she is later pressured by the lower gods to revenge him, she herself becomes the main antagonist of the story, creating an army of monsters led by her new consort, Qingu. She is ultimately defeated by Marduk, who incapacitates her with his “Evil Wind” and then kills her with an arrow. Marduk splits her in two, creating heaven and earth from her body, the Tigris and Euphrates from her eyes, mist from her spittle, mountains from her breasts and so on. Throughout the epic, there are differing descriptions of Tiamat: she appears both as a body of water, as a human figure, and as having a tail (Tablet V, line 59). These varying descriptions are ultimately reconciled as Marduk turns her limbs into geographical features.

Divine Genealogy and Syncretisms

In Enūma Eliš TT , Tiamat is the mother of all the gods (Tablet I, line 4). Together with Abzu TT she creates Lahmu and Lahamu, who in turn beget Anšar and Kišar.

Though one cannot point to a syncretism as such, there are several models for Tiamat in the earlier mythology. Katz (2011: 18f) argues that the figure of Tiamat unites two strands of tradition attached to the sea. The first is the motherly figure of Namma, who is also referred to as a primeval ocean from which the gods were created. The other is the figure of the sea as a monstrous adversary, like the Levantine god Yamm (see also Jacobsen 1968: 107). Another important influence for the figure of Tiamat is Anzu, a mythical bird defeated by Ninurta, indeed the battle between Marduk and Tiamat has a number of parallels to the battle between Ninurta and Anzu (Lambert 1986).

Cult Place(s)

There was no cult dedicated directly to Tiamat, but the battle between Tiamat and Marduk played an important role in the New Year’s festival TT in Babylon. The Enūma Eliš TT was recited on its fourth day, and some argue that the festival included a symbolic reenactment of the mythological battle (see the discussion in Lambert 2013: 461f).

Time Periods Attested

The oldest attestation of Tiamat is an Old Akkadian incantation (Westenholz 1974: 102), though there are few other references to her until the first millenium BCE (see Lambert 2013: 237). After the composition of the Enūma Eliš TT , Tiamat is found in a number of theological commentary works, but most of these seem to rely on the epic (e.g. SAA 3.39, r. 1-3). Tiamat is also mentioned by Berossus, writing in the 3rd century BCE (Breucker 2011: 648f).

Iconography

A relief from the temple of Bêl in Palmyra depicts Nabu and Marduk slaying Tiamat, who is shown with a woman’s body and legs made of snakes (Dirven 1997). However, this scene is a late Hellenistic adoption of the Babylonian motif, and no Mesopotamian image has been positively identified as a representation of Tiamat. A string of identifications (Yadin 1971, Grafman 1972, Kaplan_1976) have recently been rejected (George_2012), and until new evidence surfaces they remain dubious.

Name and Spellings

The name Tiamat is uncontracted form of the word tâmtu, meaning “sea”. The long vowel â is contracted from the short vowels i and a. The word is in the “absolute state,” a noun form that is equivalent to the vocative (a grammatical case which directly invokes or addresses a person or deity; literally the name means “O, sea!”).

Written forms: ^dti-amat, ti-amat, ^dtam-tum, ti-àm-tim, ta-à-wa-ti

Normalised forms: Tiamat, Tiāmat, Tiʼamat, Thalatta (Greek).

Tiamat in Online Corpora

Father Satan?

Father Satan?
From the desk of
Reverend.dr.Robert Fraize

marduk

Over the years Theistic Satanists have often refered to Satan as father but why?
I would think that a theistic SATANIST would not blindly follow the ideology of so called priests.
Sadly like all other spiritual paths Theistic Satanism has its leaches.
These leeches the so called ministers do not wish to teach you the truth they just want to spew some old rhetorical nonsense and take your money.

The Idea of Satan being “father” comes from the christian bible in the image of Lucifer.
but this is not even accurate as Lucifer is not a creator deity.
He did not create anything according to the bible he led an army into “hell” and was defeated.

And although I do not believe in the christianized image of Lucifer I do acknowledge his pagan roots not as The adversary of god.
Lucifer is not a christian construct it is just the idea of Lucifer being satan that has became a christian construct and those who follow that ideology are reverse christians not that there’s anything wrong with that either.

I have seen other cults say that the Babylonian solar deity Marduk who later becomes the christian god is Father Satan.
this idea comes from the fact that Marduk created human beings to be the slaves of the gods.
These cults also call Him a dragon when Marduk never was refereed to as a dragon in ancient Scripture yet these false preachers spew these lies.

Marduk was not the creator of all things.
It was TiAMAT the dragon of the primordial abyss that created all things through chaos and using dark matter which is it self the abyss.
We know that the bible is just a remake a re write of older stories and Tiamat is mentioned as the dragon of old the ancient dragon or serpent in the stories.
Marduk did not protect us from the creator we did not even exist when they battled. people who claim that Marduk fought for our freedom are lying according to their own scripture the enuma elish.

Many Traditional Theistic Satanists recognize Tiamat as The first incarnation of Satan as a deity thus recognize Satan as Female.
It was not until the religions of Abraham that Satan became a “male” figure
I challenge anyone to show me a religion pre abraham that recognizes a male adversarial creator deity.
With that Said you are free to develop your own relationship with whichever adversarial deity you choose.

Tag: satan